<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Sustainability on Open Source Funded</title>
		<link>https://ossfunded.com/tags/sustainability/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Sustainability on Open Source Funded</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-US</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://ossfunded.com/tags/sustainability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>Issue #14: AI pressure meets open-source independence</title>
				<link>https://ossfunded.com/posts/2026-06-29/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://ossfunded.com/posts/2026-06-29/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;This week in &lt;strong&gt;Open Source Funded&lt;/strong&gt;: AI is showing up less as a model-release story than as a stress test for how open-source projects fund, review, and secure their work. Zig, Nominet, CIRM, LibreOffice, the R Project, and UN Open Source Week keep funding and digital sovereignty in view, while DDEV, Continue, the Corgi/Papermark dispute, and Swift Package Index show different paths for project independence and commercial transitions. Security and governance run through the issue too, from Project Lightwell, Akrites, and Django&amp;rsquo;s CNA work to guidance and warnings from SFC, Godot, Fedora, GitLab, and others.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
